Send As SMS

The Future is Forming

"The Future is Forming," presented by Engineering Quality Solutions, discusses sheet steel/aluminum and how they are used. EQS helps steel, aluminum and manufacturing companies make the most cost-effective use of the sheet metal specified and supplied for each application. EQS offers forming limit diagram (FLD) and circle grid/ thinning strain analysis, tooling buyoff assistance, steelmaking and formability training, holistic cost reduction, steel cargo damage claim analysis and problem arbitration resolution.

Monday, October 19, 2009

Tool & Die Authority - October 2009

The Tool and Die Authority October 2009 Newsletter contained these articles:

Who’s Moving Along with the Winds of Change?: Joe Brown
Die-Setting Practice : Peter Ulintz
Transfer Systems—What Can They Do for You?: Bob Quinn
Detecting Feed in Thick Materials : Drew Stevens

and from Danny Schaeffler of Engineering Quality Solutions (EQS)...
Steel Mills are Heating Up (or, the Law of Unintended Consequences)
Last summer, the capacity-utilization rate for North American steelmakers was just about 90 percent. This meant that 90 percent of the sum total of all of the steelmaking capacity we have in North America was making steel. Then, as the economy tanked late last year, furnaces were shut off and allowed to go cold. Rather than flood the market with what would have been inexpensive steel, the capacity-utilization rate dropped to 32 percent at U.S. Steel; industry-wide, it fell to near 40 percent.

Recently, there’s been news of numerous furnaces coming back on line, due in part to the Cash-for-Clunkers program, as well as to the need for inventory restocking at the nation’s service centers. During the second week of September 2009, the steelmaking capacity-utilization rate in North America climbed to just short of 60 percent. What effect will this have on the price of steel? ...

Visit the Precision Metalforming Association website to learn how to subscribe!

Labels: ,


Post a Comment

Comment:

Over the past 20 to 30 years the stamping industry has made gigantic steps moving from a purely experienced based industry to an "esperience-science" base. We still design both parts and dies (for formability issues) by experience, but we check the performance of the design scientificly with computer simualtions. The nest step will be to incorporate the physics and math of formability into the design process as the design evolves and move into a truely "Engineering" culture. Fortunately the technilogical breakthroughs have been made. It is now just a matter of learning how to do it and doing it.

Links to this post

Create a Link


Thursday, October 15, 2009

Tool & Die Authority - September 2009

The Tool and Die Authority September 2009 Newsletter contained these articles:

Oakland University Creates an Open Forum …for Die Makers, their Customers and Other Key Stakeholders: Joe Brown
A Split Decision—Part 2: Peter Ulintz
How Does Tooling Price Impact Piece Price?: Bob Quinn
Creative Error Proofing: Drew Stevens

and from Danny Schaeffler of Engineering Quality Solutions (EQS)...
The Sound of One Hand Clapping (or, Are You Really an Author if No One Reads What You Write?)
For the year that Tool & Die Authority has been published, I’ve been writing about topics I thought would interest you. But if I’m talking about surface issues and you’re dealing with sourcing advanced high-strength steels, I’ve managed to waste your time, and mine.

So, here’s a proposal for an experiment. We are going to move you from the sidelines as a passive reader of Tool & Die Authority to an active participant in the article-writing process. Now you get to choose the topics of future articles. Just e-mail me with your ideas, and I’ll do my best to meet your expectations...

Visit the Precision Metalforming Association website to learn how to subscribe!


Post a Comment

Links to this post

Create a Link


Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Social Media and the Steel Industry

“Social media” is a generalized term that applies to how people interact online, and can include blogs, podcasts, and webinars. Traditional newspapers, magazines, and books do not allow for the audience to share their viewpoints (aside from a Letter to the Editor) and engage in a dialogue for real-time feedback. That’s what I’m hoping this site will evolve into (with your help of course!)


As I’m reading up on Web 2.0, a book by Paul Gillin called The New Influencers: A Marketer's Guide to the New Social Media was recommended to me. It’s a great read, and I recommend it to anyone, especially companies thinking about blogging. In there, Gillin provides a discussion on one of the original blogs on the sheet metal industry, The Tinbasher, run by Paul Woodhouse and Butler Sheetmetal in the UK. (Fantastic to see a mainstream shout-out to someone in the industry!)


In addition to The Tinbasher, I follow Steel Strip World run by Steve Sawford of BSS SteelStrip and Steel on the Net by Metals Consulting International for steel industry information. For tool & die blogs, I read Eric Kam’s Self Proclaimed Die Expert, Die Guy by Tim Stephens, and Tool and Dieing by Joe Brown of Lintrio.


These blogs all have a distinctive style and voice, and provide timely information and insight.


Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,


Post a Comment

Comment:

Thanks for the plug. Now counting you and my family that brings readership up to 5.

Links to this post

Create a Link


Monday, October 12, 2009

Tool & Die Authority - August 2009

The Tool and Die Authority August 2009 Newsletter contained these articles:

The Future Tooling-Talent Pool: Misperceptions Demand Attention: Joe Brown
A Split Decision: Peter Ulintz
Tooling Costs Compared—Offshore vs. On: Bob Quinn
Value-Added Operations, Part 1—Putting Stuff Together: Drew Stevens

and from Danny Schaeffler of Engineering Quality Solutions (EQS)...
Limitations of Hardness Testing for Deep-Drawing Applications (or, How to Make a Good Impression)
You’ve probably noticed that hardness is sometimes reported on your sheetmetal certs (and that if you see it, you likely are paying for it, probably a few dollars per ton). If you form mild-steel sheet in the range of 0.060-in. thick, hardness probably will fall near 75-78 HRB. But what does this really mean?

Simply put, hardness provides a measure of the material’s resistance to indentation. Of course, hardness will vary with the type of material being tested. But the test results also depend on the type of indenter being used (size/shape/material) and the amount of force used to push the indenter into the sheet. These two test parameters determine the scale used by the testing facility when reporting test results ...

Visit the Precision Metalforming Association website to learn how to subscribe!


Post a Comment

Links to this post

Create a Link


Tuesday, October 06, 2009

Advanced High Strength Steels on the 2011 Ford Fiesta: Dual Phase and Martensitic (Boron) Steels


Dual phase steel: The front and side frame rails, under-floor structural beams (“sled-runners”), side roof arches, and lateral floor reinforcements.

Martensitic steel: Roof pillars, door intrusion beams

Other Ford North America vehicles using ultra high strength steel:

Ford Flex (A-pillar)

Ford Taurus, F-Series Crew Cab and Lincoln MKS (B-pillar)

Ford Focus and Mustang (bumper)

Ford Transit Connect (front crossmember)

For more info:

http://media.ford.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=30781

http://media.ford.com/images/10031/Boron.pdf


Post a Comment

Links to this post

Create a Link


Monday, October 05, 2009

Top 10 Steel Producers

In 2008, Chinese steel production of 502 million metric tonnes was about the same as sum of the total production of the next 8 countries combined. Japan was second on the world producers list with 119 million metric tonnes, and the United States was third with 92 million metric tonnes.

Rank 2008 Rank 2007 Steel Company Production 2008 Production 2007
1 1 ArcelorMittal 103.3 116.4
2 2 Nippon Steel 37.5 35.7
3 5 Baosteel Group 35.4 28.6
4 4 POSCO 34.7 31.1
5 - Hebei Steel Group 33.3 31.1
6 3 JFE 33 34
7 11 Wuhan Steel Group 27.7 20.2
8 6 Tata Steel 24.4 26.5
9 8 Jiangsu Shagang Group 23.3 22.9
10 10 U.S. Steel 23.2 21.5
(production is in million metric tonnes)


Post a Comment

Links to this post

Create a Link